The Legitimacy of Direct Corporate Humanitarian Investment

Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):95-109 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Private firms are uniquely positioned to provide significant relief to the misery that pervades the developing world. Global misery has persisted due to a variety of failures in the provision of relief by nation-states and non-governmental organizations, including corruption and the absence of strong background institutions in the countries in need of aid. In many situations, private firms have a comparative advantage over these entities in the provision of aid. Examples such as Merck and the cure for river blindness show how firms can use their specific competencies and knowledge to relieve misery through Direct Corporate Humanitarian Investment (DCHI). DCHI is legitimized by marketplace morality and is consistent with the role of business within society, including legal dimensions. Shareholders may formally approve a corporation’s DCHI strategy and all stakeholders may act in support of their moral desires with respect to the firm and its DCHI strategy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Observations on the Global Practice of Socially Responsible Investment.Donald H. Schepers - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:164-169.
Corporate Social Performance in Family Firms.Sara A. Morris - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:154-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
40 (#398,443)

6 months
3 (#976,418)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?