How To Be Postmodern Without Being A Feminist

The Monist 77 (4):445-461 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Feminist epistemology”: on the face of it this is a contradiction in terms. “Feminism” has its origins in a social subgroup, which has tended to be particularist, separatist, and even sexist; “epistemology” is the study of the conditions of knowledge, or more modestly of justified belief, which are common to human beings as such. The question whether we can or cannot attain such conditions rationally is one of the most important topics of debate in modern philosophy, and it by no means depends on the insights of any particular group. The debate has been situated in the space between those who regard valid knowledge as unitary across all differences of social and historical context, and those who regard claims to truth as essentially relative to such contexts, without any possibility of rational adjudication between them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Considered Judgment. [REVIEW]Bruce Aune - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):724-726.
In Search Of Feminist Epistemology.Helen E. Longino - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):472-485.
In Search Of Feminist Epistemology.Helen E. Longino - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):472-485.
The Market for Feminist Epistemology.Harriet Baber - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):403-423.
Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: an introduction.Sharon L. Crasnow - 2024 - New York, NY: Routledge. Edited by Kristen Intemann.
Social Routes to Belief and Knowledge.Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - The Monist 84 (3):346-367.
Gender and Feminist Epistemology.Nancy Daukas - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 61–75.
On Basic Knowledge and Justification.Bredo C. Johnsen - 1985 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):625 - 628.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
69 (#229,839)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ernst Mach’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Science in Light of Mary B. Hesse’s Postempiricism.Pietro Gori - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (2):383-411.
Gender and philosophy of science: The case of Mary Hesse.Margareta Hallberg - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2):333-340.
Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science: Mary Hesse.Margareta Hallberg - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (2):161-171.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references