Dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa (
2016)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
This dissertation aims at a systemic presentation of Neurath’s thinking as a coherent and sui generis whole. In order to satisfy this desideratum, the main idea put forth in this dissertation is that a specific two-way relation holds between two of Neurath’s main philosophical theses:
Semantic Coherentism: a sentence is true if, and only if, it belongs to, or can be deduced from, a coherent set of sentences.
Sociological Relativism: the value of a social change depends on how it influences the living conditions of a certain group of individuals.
The two-way relation is the following: from the reconstructive point of view, Neurathian semantic coherentism entails his sociological relativism; but, from the point of view of the conceptual structure underlying Neurath’s thinking, it is his sociological relativism that entails his semantic coherentism.
We thus arrive at a virtuous circle. On the one hand, the appeal to sociological relativism (together with Neurath’s first order sociological commitments) allows us to explain his view of science; on the other hand, only once we have acquired a justification for sociological relativism, via his theory of truth, are we entitled to explain his view of science in this way.
The exposition will be guided by the attempt to find an answer to the three following questions:
(i) Does Neurath accept the standard threefold definition of knowledge?
(ii) What kind of coherentism is endorsed by Neurath?
(iii) Is Neurath’s coherentism compatible with empiricism?
The answer to the first question will be negative. It will be argued that radical physicalism (i.e. the conjunction between physicalism and epistemic naturalism) entails the rejection of this definition. The answer to the second question will amount to showing that Neurath’s endorsement of semantic coherentism does not entail, as it is sometimes stated, the endorsement of epistemic coherentism. Finally, the third question will be answered negatively by showing that, given Neurath’s theory of protocol sentences, his coherentism and his empiricism are compatible.
The exegetical work prompted by the need to answer these questions will provide us with the elements we need in order to substantiate the main idea mentioned above.