Integrating Cognitive Process and Descriptive Models of Attitudes and Preferences

Cognitive Science 38 (4):701-735 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discrete choice experiments—selecting the best and/or worst from a set of options—are increasingly used to provide more efficient and valid measurement of attitudes or preferences than conventional methods such as Likert scales. Discrete choice data have traditionally been analyzed with random utility models that have good measurement properties but provide limited insight into cognitive processes. We extend a well-established cognitive model, which has successfully explained both choices and response times for simple decision tasks, to complex, multi-attribute discrete choice data. The fits, and parameters, of the extended model for two sets of choice data (involving patient preferences for dermatology appointments, and consumer attitudes toward mobile phones) agree with those of standard choice models. The extended model also accounts for choice and response time data in a perceptual judgment task designed in a manner analogous to best–worst discrete choice experiments. We conclude that several research fields might benefit from discrete choice experiments, and that the particular accumulator-based models of decision making used in response time research can also provide process-level instantiations for random utility models

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revealed Preference and Expected Utility.Stephen A. Clark - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):159-174.
Discrete Dynamic Choice: An Extension of the Choice Models of Thurstone and Luce.John Dagsvik - 1983 - I Kommisjon Hos H. Aschehoug Og Universitetsforlaget.
Dynamic Choice Mechanisms.Ludwig von Auer - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (3):295-312.
The Construction of Preference.Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic (eds.) - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
Contextual Choice and Other Models of Preference.James E. Mazur - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):108-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-11

Downloads
22 (#515,531)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?