Order:
Disambiguations
John K. Dagsvik [4]John Dagsvik [1]
  1.  3
    Discrete dynamic choice: an extension of the choice models of Thurstone and Luce.John Dagsvik - 1983 - Oslo: I kommisjon hos H. Aschehoug og Universitetsforlaget.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  88
    Making Sen’s capability approach operational: a random scale framework.John K. Dagsvik - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (1):75-105.
    Amartya Sen has developed the so-called capability approach to meet the criticism that income alone may be insufficient as a measure of economic inequality. This is because knowledge about people’s income does not tell us what they are able to acquire with that income. For example, people with the same income may not have the same access to health and transportation services, schools and opportunities in the labor market. Recently, there has been growing interest in empirical studies based on the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  34
    What independent random utility representations are equivalent to the IIA assumption?John K. Dagsvik - 2016 - Theory and Decision 80 (3):495-499.
    This paper discusses random utility representations of the Luce model. Earlier works, such as McFadden, Yellott, and Strauss have discussed random utility representations under the assumption that utilities are additively separable in a deterministic and a random part. Under various conditions, they have established that a separable and independent random utility representation exists if and only if the random terms are type III extreme value distributed. This paper analyzes independent random utility representations without the separability condition and with an infinite (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  43
    Justification of functional form assumptions in structural models: applications and testing of qualitative measurement axioms. [REVIEW]John K. Dagsvik & Stine Røine Hoff - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (2):215-254.
    In both theoretical and applied modeling in behavioral sciences, it is common to choose a mathematical specification of functional form and distribution of unobservables on grounds of analytic convenience without support from explicit theoretical postulates. This article discusses the issue of deriving particular qualitative hypotheses about functional form restrictions in structural models from intuitive theoretical axioms. In particular, we focus on a family of postulates known as dimensional invariance. Subsequently, we discuss how specific qualitative postulates can be reformulated so as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  40
    Justification of functional form assumptions in structural models: a correction. [REVIEW]John K. Dagsvik - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (1):79-83.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark