The value of fictional worlds (or why 'the Lord of the rings' is worth reading)

Contemporary Aesthetics 8 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some works of fiction are widely held by critics to have little value, yet these works are not only popular but also widely admired in ways that are not always appreciated. In this paper I make use of Kendall Walton’s account of fictional worlds to argue that fictional worlds can and often do have value, including aesthetic value, that is independent of the works that create them. In the process, I critique Walton’s notion of fictional worlds and offer a defense of the study and appreciation of fictional worlds, as distinguished from the works of fiction with which they are associated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,662

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Art of Videogames.Grant Tavinor - 2009 - Wiley-Blackwell.
A Defense of Creationism in Fiction.Jeffrey Goodman - 2004 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
Fictional Characters and Literary Practices.Amie L. Thomasson - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):138-157.
How Remote Are Fictional Worlds From the Real World?Kendall L. Walton - 1978 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (1):11-23.
Speaking of Fictional Characters.Amie L. Thomasson - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (2):205–223.
Pretense, Existence, and Fictional Objects.Anthony Everett - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):56–80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-04-22

Downloads
119 (#103,713)

6 months
1 (#419,921)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Harold
Mount Holyoke College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references