- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Theories of rights
In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 191–206 (2004)
Abstract
This chapter contains section titled: Introduction The Nature of Rights: Logic, Substance, and Strength Rights and Their Role in Moral Theory Conclusion References.My notes
Similar books and articles
Legal powers and the will and interest theories of rights.James Penner - 2017 - In Mark McBride (ed.), New Essays on the Nature of Rights. Portland, Oregon: Hart.
The Case Against the Theories of Rights.David Frydrych - 2020 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40 (2):320-346.
Theories of Rights: Is There a Third Way?Matthew H. Kramer & Hillel Steiner - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2):281-310.
An alternative to claim-theories of rights.Robert Paul Finch - 1977 - Journal of Value Inquiry 11 (4):304-310.
Theories of Rights ‐ Edited by Ten, C. L.John Ozolins - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (3):326-330.
Henning herrestad, formal theories of rights.Giovanni Sartor - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (1):93-100.
Theories of rights - edited by ten, C. L.John Ozolins - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (3):326–330.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#538,959)
6 months
13 (#276,402)
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#538,959)
6 months
13 (#276,402)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why states have no right to privacy, but may be entitled to secrecy: a non-consequentialist defense of state secrecy.Dorota Mokrosinska - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (4):415-444.
Why states have no right to privacy, but may be entitled to secrecy: a non-consequentialist defense of state secrecy.Dorota Mokrosinska - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (4):415-444.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo