This paper suffers from a disconcerting generality. I need an excuse for wandering from Wittgenstein's Tractatus to Picasso's drawing of a Weeping Woman, via the philosophy of science and the theory of sense data. The thesis of the paper is that I have such an excuse. These are all areas where the concept of representation either exists in its own right, or has been found to be illuminating by philosophers. An important question is whether it could be the same concept in all these cases. I wish to claim that there is an illuminating common concept, even though to find it may require some fairly drastic modifications of some of the philosophical theses that are involved
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0080443600000832
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Picture Theory of Meaning.Edna Daitz - 1953 - Mind 62 (246):184-201.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Representation and a Science of Consciousness.Andrew R. Bailey - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):62-76.
Notes Toward an Analysis of Conceptual Change.Mark Bevir - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (1):55 – 63.
Concepts and Conceptual Change.Paul R. Thagard - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):255-74.
Presuming Placeholders Are Relevant Enables Conceptual Change.Christophe Heintz - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):131-132.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #385,496 of 2,533,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #390,861 of 2,533,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes