Political Liberalism, Marriage and the Family

Law and Philosophy 31 (2):185-212 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can and should political liberals recognize and otherwise support legal marriage as a matter of basic justice? In this article, we offer a general account of how political liberals should evaluate the issue of whether the legal recognition of marriage is a matter of basic justice. And, we develop and examine some public reason arguments that, given the fundamental interests of citizens, could justify various forms of legal marriage in some contexts. In particular, in certain conditions, the recognition of some form of legal marriage may be the best way to protect the fundamental interests of women as citizens in freely chosen associations. Or, it may be that, in certain conditions, to secure the social conditions necessary for gays, lesbians and bisexuals to be free and equal citizens, some form of legal marriage can or should be recognized

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-10

Downloads
136 (#33,507)

6 months
25 (#616,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Christie Hartley
Georgia State University

References found in this work

The Fundamental Argument for Same Sex Marriage.Ralph Wedgwood - 1999 - Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (3):225–242.
Homosexuality and the PIB argument.John Corvino - 2005 - Ethics 115 (3):501-534.
Privatizing Marriage.Richard H. Thaler - 2008 - The Monist 91 (3-4):377-387.

Add more references