On the Irrelevance of Neuroscience to Moral Theory

Law and Ethics of Human Rights 9 (2):173-179 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Journal Name: The Law & Ethics of Human Rights Issue: Ahead of print

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Irrelevance of Neuroscience to Moral Theory.Alon Harel - 2015 - The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 9 (2):173-179.
Religion as Identity.Avigail Eisenberg - 2016 - The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 10 (2):295-317.
Rights and Opinion: Or, The Progress of Sentiments.Thomas Poole - 2016 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 10 (2):453-478.
The Protection of Holy Places.Gideon Sapir & Daniel Statman - 2016 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 10 (1):135-155.
A Secular Manifesto for Europe.Lorenzo Zucca - 2016 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 10 (1):157-183.
The Knobe Effect, Indifference, and Constitutional Law.Moshe Cohen-Eliya & Iddo Porat - 2015 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 9 (2):229-247.
Meaning, Religion, and the State: On the Future of Liberal Human Rights.Menachem Mautner - 2016 - The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 10 (1):109-133.
Nudging Global Poverty Alleviation?Meena Krishnamurthy - 2015 - The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 9 (2):249-264.
Accommodating What Needn’t Be Special.George Letsas - 2016 - The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 10 (2):319-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-01

Downloads
22 (#699,905)

6 months
6 (#700,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references