On the Irrelevance of Neuroscience to Moral Theory

Law and Ethics of Human Rights 9 (2):173-179 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Journal Name: The Law & Ethics of Human Rights Issue: Ahead of print

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Natural Selection and Moral Sentiment.Charles W. Wright - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:459-467.
Neurolaw: Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law. Review Essay.Gerben Meynen - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):819-829.
Still in Hot Water.Duncan Purves - 2011 - Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (1):129-137.
The Price of Frankfurt’s Compatibalism.Bindu Madhok - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:577-584.
Deep Ecology and the Irrelevance of Morality.Mathew Humphrey - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):75-79.
The Moral Irrelevance of Proximity to Death.Lynn A. Jansen - 2003 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 14 (1-2):49-58.
Nature Ethics Without Theory.Joseph Mellon - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Oregon
A Note on Irrelevance in Inductive Logic.Jeff B. Paris & Alena Vencovská - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (3):357 - 370.
Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority (review).Daniel H. Frank - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):263-264.
The moral irrelevance of autonomy.Gary Comstock - 1992 - Between the Species 8 (1):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-01

Downloads
19 (#778,470)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references