Federal proportionality review in EU law whose rights are they anyway?

In Ulf Linderfalk & Eduardo Gill-Pedro (eds.), Revisiting proportionality in international and European law: interests and interest- holders. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Balancing, Proportionality and Constitutional Rights.Giorgio Bongiovanni & Chiara Valentini - 2011 - In Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 581-612.
Proportionality as a Universal Human Rights Principle.Jan Sieckmann - 2018 - In David Duarte & Jorge Silva Sampaio (eds.), Proportionality in Law: An Analytical Perspective. Springer Verlag. pp. 3-24.
Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning.Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller & Grégoire C. N. Webber (eds.) - 2014 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
When Trumps Clash: Dworkin and the Doctrine of Proportionality.Jacob Weinrib - 2017 - Ratio Juris 30 (3):341-352.
Revisiting proportionality in international and European law: interests and interest- holders.Ulf Linderfalk & Eduardo Gill-Pedro (eds.) - 2021 - Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.
Dworkin’s Theory of Rights in the Age of Proportionality.Kai Möller - 2018 - The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 12 (2):281-299.
Constitutional Rights and Proportionality.Robert Alexy - 2014 - Revus 22:51-65.
Feminizing Human Rights Adjudication: Feminist Method and the Proportionality Principle. [REVIEW]Harriet Samuels - 2013 - Feminist Legal Studies 21 (1):39-60.
Proportionality in Social Rights Adjudication: Making It Workable.Laura Clérico - 2018 - In David Duarte & Jorge Silva Sampaio (eds.), Proportionality in Law: An Analytical Perspective. Springer Verlag. pp. 25-48.
Proportionality and Compromises.Véronique Zanetti - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (1):75-97.
Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship.Grégoire Webber - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (1):179-202.
Social Rights and Proportionality Analysis.Federico De Fazio - 2018 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política 7 (1).
Gains and Losses in Balancing Social Rights.David Duarte - 2018 - In David Duarte & Jorge Silva Sampaio (eds.), Proportionality in Law: An Analytical Perspective. Springer Verlag. pp. 49-69.
Proportionality Test and Constitutional Social Rights.Federico de Fazio - 2021 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 107 (2):219-234.
The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review.Mattias Kumm - 2010 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4 (2):142-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references