Families and Futility: Forestalling Demands for Futile Treatment

Journal of Clinical Ethics 16 (4):335-344 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The most common approach to the problem of requests for futile treatment – the hospital futility policy – rests on the assumption that demands for futile treatment are both intractable and irrational. But there is another approach to the futility problem, an approach that would be dialogic, piecemeal, and case-by-case. This is the only approach that attempts to deal with both the hospital’s problem and the patient’s or family’s problem that motivates the request/demand for futile treatments. As such, it holds the promise of resolving the problem of demands for futile treatment in a way that does not generate anger and ill will at the hospital staff for what will inevitably strike patients and their families as a blatant assertion of the hospital’s power.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The physician's authority to withhold futile treatment.Glenn G. Griener - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):207-224.
Autonomy and futility.William H. Bruening - 1992 - HEC Forum 4 (5):305-313.
Conceptual and moral disputes about futile and useful treatments.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):109-121.
Is Futility a Futile Concept?B. A. Brody & A. Halevy - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):123-144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
218 (#89,365)

6 months
85 (#50,149)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Hardwig
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references