Backsliding

In Richard Mervyn Hare (ed.), Freedom and reason. Oxford,: Clarendon Press (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discusses an important objection to the view that moral judgements are prescriptive: the existence of cases in which people act in ways that they know to be wrong. The objection is that if moral judgements are prescriptive, it is impossible to accept a moral judgement and yet act contrary to it; therefore prescriptivism must be wrong. It is argued that cases of moral weakness do not constitute a counterexample to prescriptivism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
1 (#1,919,133)

6 months
1 (#1,722,083)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The indifference argument.Nick Zangwill - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (1):91 - 124.
Akrasia and self-control.David Wall - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (1):69 – 78.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references