- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Illusory intuitions: Challenging the claim of non-exclusivity
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e125 (2023)
Abstract
A person who arrives at correct solutions via false premises is right and wrong simultaneously. Similarly, a person who generates “logical intuitions” through superficial heuristics can likewise be right and wrong at the same time. However, heuristics aren't guaranteed to deliver the logical solution, so the claim that system 1 can routinely produce the alleged system 2 response is unfounded.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
On moral intuitions and moral heuristics: A response.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):565-570.
On moral intuitions and moral heuristics: A response.Sunstein Cr - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4).
Illusory intuitive inferences: Matching heuristics explain logical intuitions.Omid Ghasemi, Simon J. Handley & Stephanie Howarth - 2023 - Cognition 235 (C):105417.
Right idea, wrong magnitude system.Stella F. Lourenco, Lauren S. Aulet, Vladislav Ayzenberg, Chi-Ngai Cheung & Kevin J. Holmes - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Why Moral Heuristics can Lead to Mistaken Moral Judgments.Vitaliy Nadurak - 2020 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):99-113.
Individual procreative responsibility and the non-identity problem.Eduardo Rivera-lópez - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):336-363.
False Persuasion, Superficial Heuristics, and the Power of Logical Form to Test the Integrity of Legal Argument.Stephen M. Rice - unknown
Generalizing a model beyond the inherene heuristic and applying it to beliefs about objective value.Graham Wood - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):504-505.
Intuitions, heuristics, and utilitarianism.Peter Singer - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):560-561.
Can Eleanor Really Become a Better Person?Eric J. Silverman & Zachary Swanson - 2020-08-27 - In Kimberly S. Engels (ed.), The Good Place and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 35–46.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-07-19
Downloads
35 (#507,676)
6 months
29 (#135,383)
2023-07-19
Downloads
35 (#507,676)
6 months
29 (#135,383)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
Illusory intuitive inferences: Matching heuristics explain logical intuitions.Omid Ghasemi, Simon J. Handley & Stephanie Howarth - 2023 - Cognition 235 (C):105417.
The logic sense: exploring the role of executive functioning in belief and logic-based judgments.Stephanie Howarth, Simon Handley & Clare Walsh - 2018 - Thinking and Reasoning 25 (4):416-448.
Supposition and representation in human reasoning.Simon J. Handley & Jonathan StB. T. Evans - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (4):273-311.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-76d885d765-gm5tv uwo