A geometric introduction to forking and thorn-forking

Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):1-20 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A ternary relation [Formula: see text] between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory T is called an independence relation if it satisfies a certain set of axioms. The primary example is forking in a simple theory, but o-minimal theories are also known to have an interesting independence relation. Our approach in this paper is to treat independence relations as mathematical objects worth studying. The main application is a better understanding of thorn-forking, which turns out to be closely related to modular pairs in the lattice of algebraically closed sets.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thorn-forking as local forking.Hans Adler - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):21-38.
Properties and Consequences of Thorn-Independence.Alf Onshuus - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (1):1 - 21.
Geometry of Forking in Simple Theories.Assaf Peretz - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (1):347 - 359.
Thorn-forking in continuous logic.Clifton Ealy & Isaac Goldbring - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):63-93.
Forking and fundamental order in simple theories.Daniel Lascar & Anand Pillay - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1155-1158.
Theories with equational forking.Markus Junker & Ingo Kraus - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):326-340.
An introduction to forking.Daniel Lascar & Bruno Poizat - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (3):330-350.
Simplicity, and stability in there.Byunghan Kim - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):822-836.
A generalization of forking.Siu-Ah Ng - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):813-822.
A note on CM-Triviality and the geometry of forking.Anand Pillay - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):474-480.
Forking and independence in o-minimal theories.Alfred Dolich - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (1):215-240.
Forking in modules.Steven Garavaglia - 1981 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):155-162.
Forking in VC-minimal theories.Sarah Cotter & Sergei Starchenko - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (4):1257-1271.
Forking and dividing in NTP₂ theories.Artem Chernikov & Itay Kaplan - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
60 (#266,659)

6 months
14 (#175,970)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Generic expansion and Skolemization in NSOP 1 theories.Alex Kruckman & Nicholas Ramsey - 2018 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 169 (8):755-774.
Canonical forking in AECs.Will Boney, Rami Grossberg, Alexei Kolesnikov & Sebastien Vasey - 2016 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 167 (7):590-613.
Dp-Minimality: Basic Facts and Examples.Alfred Dolich, John Goodrick & David Lippel - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):267-288.
On dp-minimality, strong dependence and weight.Alf Onshuus & Alexander Usvyatsov - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (3):737 - 758.
Forking, imaginaries, and other features of.Christian D’elbée - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (2):669-700.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Simple theories.Byunghan Kim & Anand Pillay - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (2-3):149-164.
Toward classifying unstable theories.Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 80 (3):229-255.
Simplicity in compact abstract theories.Itay Ben-Yaacov - 2003 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 3 (02):163-191.
Characterizing Rosy Theories.Clifton Ealy & Alf Onshuus - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (3):919 - 940.
Properties and Consequences of Thorn-Independence.Alf Onshuus - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (1):1 - 21.

View all 10 references / Add more references