Can Design Arguments Be Defended Today?

In Brian Davies (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press. pp. 286--300 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume and the argument for biological design.Graham Oppy - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):519-534.
What is wrong with intelligent design?Gregory W. Dawes - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.
Utility Reassessed: The Role of Ethics in the Practice of Design.Judy Attfield (ed.) - 1999 - Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by St. Martin's Press.
Seeking God in Science: An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design.Bradley Monton - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):254 - 259.
Usa today's innovations and their impact on journalism ethics.Robert A. Logan - 1986 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 1 (2):74 – 87.
A user's guide to design arguments.Trent Dougherty & Ted Poston - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (1):99-110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-30

Downloads
2 (#1,802,998)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references