The application-conditions for design inferences: Why the design arguments need the help of other arguments for God’s existence [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (1):1 - 33 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11153-004-5894-7

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Design Inferences in an Infinite Universe.Bradley Monton - 2007 - In Jon Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Volume 2. Oxford University Press.
Design arguments for the existence of God.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Darwin, Design and Dawkins' Dilemma.David H. Glass - 2012 - Sophia 51 (1):31-57.
Arguments from design: A self-defeating strategy?Victoria Harrison - 2005 - Philosophia 33 (1-4):297-317.
The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2004 - In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 117–147.
The argument from design.R. G. Swinburne - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):199 - 212.
Hume and the argument for biological design.Graham Oppy - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):519-534.
Introducing philosophy of religion.Chad V. Meister - 2009 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
68 (#231,141)

6 months
13 (#165,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

What is wrong with intelligent design?Gregory W. Dawes - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references