No Time Travel for Presentists

Logos and Episteme 1 (2):353-360 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the present paper, I offer a new argument to show that presentism about time is incompatible with time travel. Time travel requires leaving the present, which, under presentism, contains all of reality. Therefore to leave the present moment is to leave reality entirely; i.e. to go out of existence. Presentist “time travel” is therefore best seen as a form of suicide, not as a mode of transportation. Eternalists about time do not face the same difficulty, and time travel is compossible with eternalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-05

Downloads
397 (#53,229)

6 months
15 (#233,546)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Hales
Bloomsburg University

References found in this work

The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David K. Lewis - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
A Defense of Presentism.Ned Markosian - 2004 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1:47-82.
A future for presentism.Craig Bourne - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Presentism and properties.John Bigelow - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:35-52.
On What There Is.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1948 - Review of Metaphysics 2 (5):21-38.

View all 19 references / Add more references