Time Travel and the Open Future

Disputatio 1 (19):223 - 232 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the thesis that time travel is logically possible, is inconsistent with the necessary truth of any of the usual ‘open futureobjective present’ models of the universe. It has been relatively uncontroversial until recently to hold that presentism is inconsistent with the possibility of time travel. I argue that recent arguments to the contrary do not show that presentism is consistent with time travel. Moreover, the necessary truth of other open future-objective present models which we might, prima facie, have supposed to be more amenable to the possibility of time travel, turn out also to be inconsistent with this possibility.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-06

Downloads
974 (#14,119)

6 months
122 (#32,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristie Miller
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

Time.Ned Markosian - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Tensed Facts and the Fittingness of our Attitudes 1.Kristie Miller - 2022 - Philosophical Perspectives 36 (1):216-232.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David K. Lewis - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
Time, Tense, and Causation.Michael Tooley - 1997 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David Lewis - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. Oxford University Press UK.
How do we know it is now now?David Braddon-Mitchell - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):199–203.
A Model of the Universe.Storrs McCall - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):113-115.

View all 13 references / Add more references