- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Exemplar similarity and rule application
Cognition 114 (1):1-18 (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is this what the debate on rules was about?Ulrike Hahn - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):25-26.
Rule and similarity as prototype concepts.Edward E. Smith - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):34-35.
Empirical dissociations between rule-based and similarity-based categorization.Gregory Ashby & Michael B. Casale - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):15-16.
Rules and similarity in adult concept learning.James Close, Ulrike Hahn, Carl Hodgets & Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2010 - In Denis Mareschal, Paul Quinn & Stephen E. G. Lea (eds.), The Making of Human Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Rule versus similarity: Different in processing mode, not in representations.Rolf Reber - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):31-32.
Illuminating reasoning and categorization.Evan Heit & Brett K. Hayes - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):27-27.
Similarity and Rules United: Similarity‐ and Rule‐Based Processing in a Single Neural Network.Tom Verguts & Wim Fias - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (2):243-259.
In search of radical similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
Preferring rules to similarity: Coherence, goals, and commitment.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):37-49.
Do the right thing! Rule finitism, rule scepticism and rule following.Wes Sharrock & Graham Button - 1999 - Human Studies 22 (2-4):193-210.
Getting Rid of Derivational Redundancy or How to Solve Kuhn’s Problem.Rens Bod - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (1):47-66.
A goal-dependent abstraction for legal reasoning by analogy.Tokuyasu Kakuta, Makoto Haraguchi & Yoshiaki Okubo - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (1-2):97-118.
It's not how many dimensions you have, it's what you do with them: Evidence from speech perception.Bob McMurray & David Gow - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):31-31.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
44 (#359,559)
6 months
15 (#164,417)
2014-01-20
Downloads
44 (#359,559)
6 months
15 (#164,417)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Eye movements reveal memory processes during similarity- and rule-based decision making.Agnes Scholz, Bettina von Helversen & Jörg Rieskamp - 2015 - Cognition 136 (C):228-246.
A Similarity-Based Process for Human Judgment in the Parietal Cortex.Linnea Karlsson Wirebring, Sara Stillesjö, Johan Eriksson, Peter Juslin & Lars Nyberg - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12:408056.
Building Memory Representations for Exemplar-Based Judgment: A Role for Ventral Precuneus.Sara Stillesjö, Lars Nyberg & Linnea Karlsson Wirebring - 2019 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13:447776.
Memory shapes judgments: Tracing how memory biases judgments by inducing the retrieval of exemplars.Agnes Rosner & Bettina von Helversen - 2019 - Cognition 190 (C):165-169.
References found in this work
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.J. R. Stroop - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (6):643.
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Irving Biederman - 1987 - Psychological Review 94 (2):115-147.
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Ronald A. Rensink, J. Kevin O'Regan & James J. Clark - 1997 - Psychological Science 8:368-373.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo