Rule versus similarity: Different in processing mode, not in representations

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):31-32 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on an example from artificial grammar learning, I present the case that similarity processes can be computationally identical to rules processes, but that participants in an artificial grammar learning experiment may use different processing modes to classify stimuli. The number of properties and other representational differences between rule and similarity processes are an accidental consequence of strategies used.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#445,254)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rolf Reber
University of Oslo

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references