Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):31-32 (2005)

Authors
Rolf Reber
University of Oslo
Abstract
Drawing on an example from artificial grammar learning, I present the case that similarity processes can be computationally identical to rules processes, but that participants in an artificial grammar learning experiment may use different processing modes to classify stimuli. The number of properties and other representational differences between rule and similarity processes are an accidental consequence of strategies used.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x05410018
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
28 ( #408,193 of 2,506,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes