A Call for Clarity and a Review of the Empirical Evidence: Comment on Felman and Turner's ‘Why Not NIMBY?’

Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (3):313-316 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This response contributes to Feldman and Turner's interesting discussion in two ways: firstly, it provides some clarity on the definition of the term ‘NIMBY’; and, secondly, it incorporates some of...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Not NIMBY?Simon Feldman & Derek Turner - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (1):105-115.
Why Not NIMBY?Simon Feldman & Derek Turner - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (3):251-266.
How should philosophy be clear? Loaded clarity, default clarity, and Adorno.Nicholas Joll - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (146):73–95.
Clarity and the grammar of skepticism.Chris Barker - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (3):253-273.
Observation: An Empirical Discussion.Daniel Gilman - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:355 - 364.
Are empirical evidence claims a priori?Peter Achinstein - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):447-473.
Comment by James Turner Johnson.James Turner Johnson - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):331-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
16 (#889,721)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Not NIMBY?Simon Feldman & Derek Turner - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (1):105-115.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references