Are empirical evidence claims a priori?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):447-473 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An a priori thesis about evidence, defended by many, states that the only empirical fact that can affect the truth of an objective evidence claim of the form ‘e is evidence for h’ (or ‘e confirms h to degree r’) is the truth of e; all other considerations are a priori. By examining cases involving evidential flaws, I challange this claim and defend an empirical concept of evidence. In accordance with such a concept, whether, and the extent to which, e, if true, confirms h is an empirical, not a priori, fact

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sobre el carácter no empírico de los enunciados de confirmación.Alejandro Cassini - 2006 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 31 (2):135-153.
A Priori Justification and Experience.Jamie Carlin Watson - 2009 - Dissertation, Florida State University
Naturalism, Fallibilism, and the a Priori.Lisa Warenski - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):403-426.
Revisability and the a Priori.Jeremy Fantl - 2000 - Dissertation, Brown University
The a Priori.George Bealer - 1999 - In John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Blackwell. pp. 2004.
Evidence in Logic.Ben Martin & Ole Thomassen Hjortland - forthcoming - In Maria Lasonen-Aarnio & Clayton M. Littlejohn (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Evidence. Routledge.
Is Apriority Context-Sensitive?Nenad Miščević - 2005 - Acta Analytica 20 (1):55-80.
A Theory of the a Priori.George Bealer - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:29-55.
Need for Empirical Recognition.Nina Strohminger - 2015 - Emotion Review 7 (4):383-383.
Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?Colin Marshall - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):549-576.
A Priori Justification.Albert Casullo - 2003 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
282 (#41,017)

6 months
1 (#417,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Achinstein
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic.Michael Huemer - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):345-375.
Robust Evidence and Secure Evidence Claims.Kent W. Staley - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):467-488.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references