Human Studies 43 (4):521-543 (2020)
AbstractTo make Adorno’s difficult notion of “identity thinking” more amendable to sociological research, this project brings his Negative Dialectics into conversation with Schutz’s theory of typification. When revised with Adorno’s attention to political economy and the pathologies of reification, Schutz’s framework allows for an analysis of identity thinking in everyday life. Both theorists argue that categories of thought: automatically subsume objects for pragmatic yet socially conditioned reasons, are socially formed, transferred, and selected, and suppress particularizing characteristics of objects. Their overlapping arguments are cross-fertilized to propose a critical approach to cognitive sociology that can engage in a form of ideology critique that illuminates forms of thinking that conceal social contradictions. This approach is useful for explaining the “mundane dialectic of enlightenment”: the daily reproduction of unreflective rationalization that breeds irrationality in the form of social domination and environmental harm, a contradiction which finds its ultimate expression in climate change inaction.
Similar books and articles
Adorno, Hegel, and Dialectic.Alison Stone - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1118-1141.
Typification in Society and Social Science: The Continuing Relevance of Schutz’s Social Phenomenology. [REVIEW]Kwang-ki Kim & Tim Berard - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (3):263 - 289.
Typification in Society and Social Science: The Continuing Relevance of Schutz’s Social Phenomenology.Kwang-ki Kim & Tim Berard - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (3):263-289.
Habermas and Adorno on "Dialectic of Enlightenment".Alex Pienknagura - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Hegel and the Dialectic of Enlightenment : The Recognition of Education in Civil Society.Nigel Tubbs - unknown
Adorno, Ideology and Ideology Critique.Deborah Cook - 2001 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (1):1-20.
Approaches to the Study of the World of Everyday Life.George Psathas - 1980 - Human Studies 3 (1):3 - 17.
『계몽의 변증법』에 나타난 계몽의 아포리아에 관한 고찰 (A Study on the Aporia of Enlightenment in Dialectic of Enlightenment).Juyong Kim - 2018 - 시대와 철학(Shi Dae Wa Cheol Hak; Epoch and Philosophy) 29 (4):101-131.
Climate Change, Buen Vivir, and the Dialectic of Enlightenment: Toward a Feminist Critical Philosophy of Climate Justice.Regina Cochrane - 2014 - Hypatia 29 (3):576-598.
On the Question of Identity Between Erroneous Thinking and Existence.Kuan Feng & Eugene I. Chang - 1972 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 3 (4):324-335.
Speculation, Dialectic and Critique: Hegel and Critical Theory in Germany After 1945.Cat Moir - 2017 - Hegel Bulletin 38 (2):199-220.
The Dialectic of Enlightenment: A Contemporary Reading.Yvonne Sherratt - 1999 - History of the Human Sciences 12 (3):35-54.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How Do Social Structures Become Taken for Granted? Social Reproduction in Calm and Crisis.Ryan Gunderson - 2021 - Human Studies 44 (4):741-762.
References found in this work
The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.Peter Berger & Thomas Luckmann - 1966 - Anchor Books.
History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics.Georg Lukacs - 1971 - MIT Press.