The debate over food biotechnology in the United States: Is a societal consensus achievable?

Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):327-346 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The debate over food biotechnology in the united states: Is a societal consensus achievable?Edward Groth - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):327-346.
The ethics of agri-food biotechnology : how can an agricultural technology be so important?Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Commentary.Egbert Schroten - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):196-198.
The transatlantic rift in genetically modified food policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
"It's like déjà-vu, all over again" : anticipating societal responses to nanotechnologies.Amy K. Wolfe & David J. Bjornstad - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Retail relations: an interlocking directorate analysis of food retailing corporations in the United States. [REVIEW]Rachel A. Schwartz & Thomas A. Lyson - 2007 - Agriculture and Human Values 24 (4):489-498.
Ethics in the societal debate on genetically modified organisms: A (re)quest for sense and sensibility. [REVIEW]Yann Devos, Pieter Maeseele, Dirk Reheul, Linda Van Speybroeck & Danny De Waele - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (1):29-61.
Biotechnology is not compatible with sustainable agriculture.Martha L. Crouch - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):98-111.
Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States. [REVIEW]Benjamin M. Cole & Preeta M. Banerjee - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3):555-574.
Biotechnology and the Food Label: A Legal Perspective.Frederick Degnan - 2008 - In Paul Weirich (ed.), Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate. Oup Usa.
The first European congress on agricultural and food ethics and follow-up workshop on ethics and food biotechnology: A US perspective. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Burkhardt, Paul B. Thompson & Tarla Rae Peterson - 2000 - Agriculture and Human Values 17 (4):327-332.
More than a license to drive: State restrictions on the use of driver's licenses by noncitizens.Maria Pabon Lopez - unknown
Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology. [REVIEW]Susanna Hornig Priest & Allen W. Gillespie - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):529-539.
Free trade and economic integration with the United States : A critical view.J. Quiggin - 2003 - Dialogue: Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia. 22 (2):33-37.
What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos.Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.) - 2008 - Elsevier/Academic Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-22

Downloads
3 (#1,706,418)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How japanese students reason about agricultural biotechnology.Fumi Maekawa & Darryl Macer - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):705-716.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references