Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate [Book Review]

Informal Logic 43 (1):138-146 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article reviews Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud’s How Philosopher’s Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate (Springer 2022).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Competing Narratives in the Russell-Copleston Debate.Andreas Gonçalves Lind & Bruno Nobre - 2020 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76 (4):1363-1396.
A Metafísica de Copleston e o Debate com Russell.Alexander Maar - 2020 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76 (4):1331-1362.
A new look at the cosmological argument.Robert C. Koons - 1997 - American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):193 - 211.
Dialogues About God.Charles Taliaferro - 2008 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Representing the Structure of a Debate.Maralee Harrell - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (4):595-610.
Review: F. C. Copleston, Bertrand Russell. [REVIEW]Robert Feys - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):302-302.
A Critical View on Copleston's Report of the Platonic Ideas.Majid SadrMajles - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 4 (216):49-80.
Bertrand Russell.Frederick C. Copleston - 1950 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 9 (33):261.
A note on verification.Frederick C. Copleston - 1950 - Mind 59 (236):522-529.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-31

Downloads
10 (#1,188,669)

6 months
8 (#352,539)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leo Groarke
Trent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references