Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76 (4):1363-1396 (2020)

Abstract
In 1948, Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston entertained us with a radiophonic debate, on the BBC, concerning the rational proofs of God’s existence. This debate is primarily a product of Authors’ mindset. In this sense, every argument on each side presupposes a universal reason from which human intellect can grasp a certain degree of truth. Therefore, we would expect that the debate 75 years old to be outdated. Or maybe, Russell’s agnostic position could, at first sight, seem to be more aligned with a contemporary post-modern mindset than Copleston’s theism. However, we disagree with the aforementioned thesis. We will not argue that Copleston won the debate by means of reason alone. We will rather show that both positions emerge from different ontologies. And these ones are intertwined with specific narratives and its respective ways of life. For that matter, the Russell-Copleston debate substantiates the thesis of Radical Orthodoxy. Deep down, John Milbank’s “ontology of peace,” as opposed to the Nietzschean nihilism, emerges from this debate. In this sense, while Copleston’s argumentation grounds this narrative on an ontology of peace, Russell tends to follow in a nihilism capable of destroying the communion between different persons. In this sense, the debate is still up to date.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
DOI 10.17990/rpf/2020_76_4_1363
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Metafísica de Copleston E o Debate Com Russell.Alexander Maar - 2020 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76 (4):1331-1362.
A New Look at the Cosmological Argument.Robert C. Koons - 1997 - American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):193 - 211.
Dialogues About God.Charles Taliaferro - 2008 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Russell on Metaphysical Vagueness.Mark Colyvan - 2001 - Principia 5 (1-2):87-98.
Bertrand Russell.Frederick C. Copleston - 1950 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 9 (33):261.
The Interaction of Russell and Bradley.C. Keen - 1971 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies:7.
The Interaction of Russell and Bradley.C. Keen - 1983 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 3:7.
A Critical View on Copleston's Report of the Platonic Ideas.Majid SadrMajles - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 4 (216):49-80.
A Note on Verification.Frederick C. Copleston - 1950 - Mind 59 (236):522-529.
Review: F. C. Copleston, Bertrand Russell. [REVIEW]Robert Feys - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):302-302.
Frederick C. Copleston Ve Bertrand Russell: Tanrının Varlığı Üzerine Bir Tartışma.Hüseyin Tolu - 2019 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 9 (9:4).
Russell on Metaphysical Vagueness.Mark Colyvan - 2001 - Principia: Revista Internacional de Epistemologia 5 (1-2):89-98.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-02-01

Total views
1 ( #1,558,302 of 2,533,564 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,564 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes