A Case Study in the Applioation of Mathematics to Physics: Descartes’ Principles Of Philosophy, Part II

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986 (1):116-124 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question of how and why the application of mathematics to physical reality is possible has occupied philosophers for many centuries. In contemporary discussions, Philip Kitcher’s attack on a priorist approaches to the question is particularly interesting, for it suggests that there is no global answer (Kitcher 1983, Chapters 1-4). In this essay, I would like to develop his insight by arguing, first, that the problem of how mathematics relates to physical reality should be addressed by an appeal to the history of mathematics and the sciences in the form of case studies which analyze the peculiar and changing ways in which these domains interact. Generalizations about such interaction should be made carefully, in a kind of local and piecemeal retrospective; I believe that the historical record will show that the grounds of justification and the form of applied mathematics changes dramatically from one historical era to the next.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Case Study in the Application of Mathematics to Physics: Descartes' Principles of Philosophy, Part II.Emily R. Grosholz - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:116 - 124.
A Structuralist Approach to Applying Mathematics.Chris John Pincock - 2002 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Physics in Mathematics.Daniele Molinini - 2023 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 74 (4):853-874.
Direct and converse applications: Two sides of the same coin?Daniele Molinini - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (1):1-21.
How Foundational Work in Mathematics Can Be Relevant to Philosophy of Science.John P. Burgess - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:433 - 441.
Kitcher's Naturalistic Epistemology and Methodology of Mathematics.Jesus Alcolea - 2012 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):295-326.
Problematic Objects between Mathematics and Mechanics.Emily R. Grosholz - 1990 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (2):385-395.
Philosophy of Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2011 - In J. Saatsi & S. French (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Continuum. pp. 314-333.
Intended and Unintended Mathematics: The Case of the Lagrange Multipliers.Daniele Molinini - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (1):93-113.
Mathematics, science and ontology.Thomas Tymoczko - 1991 - Synthese 88 (2):201 - 228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-30

Downloads
8 (#1,344,496)

6 months
5 (#710,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emily Grosholz
Pennsylvania State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The inherence pattern and Descartes'.Thomas M. Lennon - 1974 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (1):43-52.
The Inherence Pattern and Descartes' "Ideas".Thomas A. Lennon - 1974 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (1):43.
Descartes.S. V. Keeling - 1951 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:320-321.
Three Cartesian Epistemologies.Emily Grosholz - 1987 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 12 (1-2):49-80.

Add more references