Discrepancies Between the Best Philosophical Account of Human Rights and the International Law of Human Rights

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):1-28 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The best philosophical account of human rights regards them as protections of the values we attach to human agency. The international law of human rights is embodied in a large number of declarations, conventions, covenants, charters, and judicial decisions. There are many discrepancies between the lists of human rights that emerge from these two authoritative sources. This lecture explores the significance of these discrepancies

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human rights without foundations.Joseph Raz - 2010 - In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
What Is Special About Human Rights?Christian Barry & Nicholas Southwood - 2011 - Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):369-83.
On the Misconceived Genealogy of Human Rights.Gary B. Herbert - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:17-32.
Agency and Human Rights.S. Matthew Liao - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):15-25.
Human Rights.João Cardoso Rosas - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:93-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
132 (#138,459)

6 months
11 (#232,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references