On the Misconceived Genealogy of Human Rights

Social Philosophy Today 21:17-32 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The general practice of tracing the concept of human rights back to its presumed philosophical origins in the concepts of natural law and/or natural right, and invoking those concepts to give the idea of human rights its moral direction and philosophical substance, is dramatically mistaken. Interpreting human rights as the philosophical progeny of these earlier traditions allows the uglier aspects of natural rights and natural law, which the concept of human rights was intended to remedy, to serve as the defining characteristics of human rights.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human rights and human well-being.William Talbott - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Global Reach of Human Rights.Amartya Sen - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):91-100.
Human Nature and Human Rights.Donald V. Poochigain - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:131-135.
Human rights without foundations.Joseph Raz - 2010 - In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
The Human Right to Subsistence.Charles Jones - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):57-72.


Added to PP

94 (#173,133)

6 months
4 (#477,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Human Needs: A Realist Perspective.Alison Assiter & Jeff Noonan - 2007 - Journal of Critical Realism 6 (2):173-198.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references