Bad "science"

American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):21 – 22 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bad science? [REVIEW]Christian Perring - 2002 - The Philosophers' Magazine 18:56-56.
Bad science?Christian Perring - 2002 - The Philosophers' Magazine 18:56-56.
Beyond “Bad Science‘.Helen Longino - 1983 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 8 (1):7-17.
Bad science [Book Review].Robert Bender - 2017 - Australian Humanist, The 125:23.
Bad Science, Good Ethics.Karen Lebacqz - 2003 - Theology and Science 1 (2):193-201.
Three Good Things about "Bad" Science.Neil R. Smalheiser - 1994 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 38 (1):58-60.
Is transhumanism good science, bad science, or pseudoscience?Arvin M. Gouw - 2022 - In Arvin M. Gouw, Brian Patrick Green & Ted Peters (eds.), Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Is transhumanism good science, bad science, or pseudoscience?Arvin M. Gouw - 2022 - In Arvin M. Gouw, Brian Patrick Green & Ted Peters (eds.), Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Bad Science Hurts Catholic Physicians.Gwyneth Spaeder - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (4):567-575.
Tainted: How Philosophy of Science Can Expose Bad Science. [REVIEW]Arianne Shahvisi - 2016 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):193-196.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#181,865)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Human embryo research and the language of moral uncertainty.William P. Cheshire - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):1 – 5.

Add more references