Bad science?

The Philosophers' Magazine 18:56-56 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bad science? [REVIEW]Christian Perring - 2002 - The Philosophers' Magazine 18:56-56.
Bad "science".Ronald M. Green - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):21 – 22.
Bad science [Book Review].Robert Bender - 2017 - Australian Humanist, The 125:23.
Beyond “Bad Science‘.Helen Longino - 1983 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 8 (1):7-17.
Is transhumanism good science, bad science, or pseudoscience?Arvin M. Gouw - 2022 - In Arvin M. Gouw, Brian Patrick Green & Ted Peters (eds.), Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Is transhumanism good science, bad science, or pseudoscience?Arvin M. Gouw - 2022 - In Arvin M. Gouw, Brian Patrick Green & Ted Peters (eds.), Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Three Good Things about "Bad" Science.Neil R. Smalheiser - 1994 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 38 (1):58-60.
Tainted: How Philosophy of Science Can Expose Bad Science. [REVIEW]Arianne Shahvisi - 2016 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):193-196.
Bad Science, Good Ethics.Karen Lebacqz - 2003 - Theology and Science 1 (2):193-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
1 (#1,913,683)

6 months
42 (#98,106)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Perring
St. John's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references