Artificial Consciousness is Unlikely to Possess a Moral Capacity

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):79-81 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Elizabeth Hildt’s (2023) notion of human-like artificial consciousness (AC) is vulnerable to several objections. First, she ties it to traits such as subjectivity and to capacities for rationality,...

Similar books and articles

An Alternative Approach to Assessing the Moral Status of Artificial Entities.Dominic McGuire - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):76-79.
An Immortal Ghost in the Machine?Richard B. Gibson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):81-83.
Artificial Consciousness Is Morally Irrelevant.Bruce P. Blackshaw - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):72-74.
Philosophical foundations of artificial consciousness.Ron Chrisley - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 44 (2):119-137.
Non-Human Moral Status: Problems with Phenomenal Consciousness.Joshua Shepherd - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):148-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-27

Downloads
180 (#112,873)

6 months
119 (#38,338)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Prospects of Artificial Consciousness: Ethical Dimensions and Concerns.Elisabeth Hildt - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):58-71.
Human Rights as Social Construction.Benjamin Gregg - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Human Rights as Social Construction.Andrew Koppelman & Benjamin Gregg - 2014 - Contemporary Political Theory 13 (4):380-386.

Add more references