Theory of mind in nonhuman primates: A question of language?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):121-121 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two substantive comments are made. The first is methodological, and concerns Heyes's proposals for a critical test for theory of mind. The second is theoretical, and concerns the appropriateness of asking questions about theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Although Heyes warns against the apparent simplicity of the theory of mind hypothesis, she underplays the linguistic implications

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theory of mind and other domain-specific hypotheses.C. M. Heyes - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1143-1145.
Liberalism, chauvinism, and experimental thought.C. M. Heyes - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):134-148.
What can we learn from the absence of evidence?Thomas R. Zentall - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):133-134.
More theory and evolution.Radu Bogdan - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):390-391.
Primate cognitive neuroscience: What are the useful questions?A. Parker - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):128-128.
More theory and evolution, please!Radu J. Bogdan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1140-1141.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates.C. M. Heyes - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):101-114.
The prior question: Do human primates have a theory of mind?Robert M. Gordon - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):120-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#548,607)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references