More theory and evolution

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):390-391 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heyes’s skepticism about theory of mind (ToM) in nonhuman primates exploits the idea of a strong and unified theory of mind in humans based on an unanalyzed category of mental state. It also exploits narrow debates about crucial observations and experiments while neglecting wider evolutionary trends. I argue against both exploitations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

More theory and evolution, please!Radu J. Bogdan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1140-1141.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates: A question of language?Colin Gray & Phil Russell - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):121-121.
The prior question: Do human primates have a theory of mind?Robert M. Gordon - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):120-121.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates.C. M. Heyes - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):101-114.
What can we learn from the absence of evidence?Thomas R. Zentall - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):133-134.
The cultural evolution of mind-modelling.Richard Moore - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):1751-1776.
Theory of mind and the “somatic Marker mechanism” (SMM).Bruce G. Charlton - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1141-1142.
Seeing is not believing.Gergely Csibra - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):117-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
24 (#155,087)

6 months
24 (#640,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references