Right to die or duty to live? The problem of euthanasia

Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):19–32 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argument about euthanasia in Australia intensified following the world's first legal euthanasia death of Bob Dent under the Northern Territory's short-lived Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995. This paper takes stock of the implacably opposed positions on euthanasia following Bob Dent's death, which provides a focus for the controversy, and identifies the key doctrines which separate adversaries in the euthanasia debate and their associated incommensurable intuitions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Euthanasia and Eudaimonia.David Shaw - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (9):530-533.
Is There a Duty to Die?John Hardwig - 1997 - Hastings Center Report 27 (2):34-42.
Euthanasia and Common Sense: A Reply to Garcia.G. Seay - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):321-327.
Who Shall Live? Who Shall Die? Who Shall Play God? Some Reflections on Euthanasia.Patrick Derr - 1982 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 57 (4):422-437.
The right to live, the right to die.Charles Everett Koop - 1976 - Wheaton, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers.
Killing and letting die.James Rachels - 2001 - In Lawrence C. Becker Mary Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd Edition. Routledge.
Euthanasia and physicians' moral duties.Gary Seay - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):517 – 533.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
164 (#114,638)

6 months
7 (#416,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?