Defending human difference by raising the bar

Animal Sentience 23 (54) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Chapman & Huffman (C&H) offer a theory of why we humans want to believe that we are different: to justify our cruelty to animals. This commentary offers further supporting evidence of this and examines more closely what the claim that humans are ‘different’ amounts to. It also considers some methodological issues in animal psychology closely related to C&H ‘s theory. These problems result from a common strategy for defending hypotheses about human difference.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A scalar implicature-based approach to neg-raising.Jacopo Romoli - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (4):291-353.
A Pessoa Vive no Ser Humano.Joana Pereira Marques - 2010 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (35):121-142.
Overlappings: Probability-raising without causation.Jonathan Schaffer - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1):40 – 46.
In Defense of the Human Difference.Sean J. McGrath - 2018 - Environmental Philosophy 15 (1):101-115.
Non-Identity Matters, Sometimes.Justin Weinberg - 2014 - Utilitas 26 (1):23-33.
Hume on the Moral Difference between Humans and Other Animals.Denis G. Arnold - 1995 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (3):303 - 316.
Volitions and Actions.Michael Martin - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):187 - 190.
Neg-Raising and Neg movement.Paul Crowley - 2019 - Natural Language Semantics 27 (1):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references