The persistence of UCS intensity effects in acquired drive conditioning

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (3):166-168 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03334231

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Acquired drive strength as a joint function of shock intensity and number of acquisition trials.Melvin L. Goldstein - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (6):349.
CS intensity and CS-UCS interval effects in human eyelid conditioning.Harold D. Fishbein, Paul D. Jones & Colin Silverthorne - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):109.
Classical conditioning without discrimination training: A test of the generalization theory of CS intensity effects.G. Robert Grice, Laraine Masters & David L. Kohfeld - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):510.
Effects of ucs intensity upon conditioning and extinction of the gsr.F. W. Boring & M. C. Morrow - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):567.
Interaction of habit (h) and drive (d) in classical eyelid conditioning: H and D as functions of ucs intensity.James J. Hug & John J. Porter - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):150.
Postconditioning delay and intensity of shock as factors in the measurement of acquired fear.Wallace R. McAllister & Dorothy E. McAllister - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):110.
Differential effects of shock intensity on one-way and shuttle avoidance conditioning.John Theios, A. David Lynch & William F. Lowe Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):294.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
Reduced stimulus intensity as a cs in gsr conditioning.R. A. Champion - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):631.
Drive level effects on the conditioning of frustration.Jeffrey M. Cohen - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):297.
Second interval discrimination conditioning of the GSR as a function of UCS intensity and trace and delay conditioning paradigms.Arthur R. Zeiner - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):276.
Drive conditioning as a factor in latent learning.Paul E. Meehl & Kenneth Maccorquodale - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):20.
Level of conditioning and intensity of the adaptation stimulus.Janet A. Taylor - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (2):127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
13 (#1,036,484)

6 months
4 (#790,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references