CS intensity and CS-UCS interval effects in human eyelid conditioning

, &
Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):109 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0027450

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
Eyelid trace conditioning, CS intensity, CS-UCS interval, and a correction for "spontaneous" blinking.Stanley G. Lipkin & John W. Moore - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):216.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-US interval.Wallace R. McAllister - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):417.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):131.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.Kenneth W. Spence & Eugenia B. Norris - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):716.
Classical conditioning without discrimination training: A test of the generalization theory of CS intensity effects.G. Robert Grice, Laraine Masters & David L. Kohfeld - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):510.
Effects of stimulus complexity, interstimulus interval, and masking task conditions in differential eyelid conditioning.Melanie J. Mayer & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):469.
The effect on eyelid conditioning of shifting the CS-US interval.Wallace R. McAllister - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):423.
Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of the UCS.Kenneth W. Spence - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):57.
UCS intensity and the associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR.K. W. Spence, D. F. Haggard & L. E. Ross - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (5):404.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity.Leonard E. Ross & Kenneth W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (6):379.
Human eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval.Harold D. Fishbein & Mary Leblanc - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
20 (#740,497)

6 months
8 (#341,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references