- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A critique of Alloy and Tabachnik's theoretical framework for understanding covariation assessment
Psychological Review 95 (2):296-298 (1988)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Expectations and situational information as cocontributors to covariation assessment: A reply to Goddard and Allan.Lauren B. Alloy - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (2):299-301.
Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information.Lauren B. Alloy & Naomi Tabachnik - 1984 - Psychological Review 91 (1):112-149.
Updating, evidence evaluation, and operator availability: A theoretical framework for understanding belief.Joseph Sommer, Julien Musolino & Pernille Hemmer - 2024 - Psychological Review 131 (2):373-401.
Covariation in natural causal induction.Patricia W. Cheng & Laura R. Novick - 1992 - Psychological Review 99 (2):365-382.
Positive bias in the perception of covariation.Yaakov Kareev - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (3):490-502.
From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Patricia W. Cheng - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (2):367-405.
The supposed competition between theories of human causal inference.David Danks - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (2):259 – 272.
How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation.Dustin Wood, Molly Hensler Gardner & P. D. Harms - 2015 - Psychological Review 122 (1):84-111.
A critique of G. W. Allport's theory of motivation.Peter A. Bertocci - 1940 - Psychological Review 47 (6):501-532.
Differentiating mental models of self and others: A hierarchical framework for knowledge assessment.Aakriti Kumar, Padhraic Smyth & Mark Steyvers - 2023 - Psychological Review 130 (6):1566-1591.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
10 (#395,257)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
2016-06-30
Downloads
10 (#395,257)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo