Relativism, Commensurability and Translatability

In John Preston (ed.), Wittgenstein and Reason. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 21–46 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Varieties of Relativism Conceptual Relativism and Conceptual Schemes Davidson on Conceptual Schemes The Davidsonian Argument against Conceptual Relativism Complete Failure of Translation Conceptual Diversity and Translatability Translatability and Languagehood Close your heart to charity Conclusion References.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Davidson on the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.George Wrisley - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 162–168.
Conceptual Relativism.Kenneth A. Taylor - 2010 - In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 159–178.
On Davidson's refutation of conceptual schemes and conceptual relativism.Xinli Wang - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):140-164.
Conceptual Schemes.David Henderson - 2013 - In Ernie Lepore & Kurt Ludwig (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Donald Davidson. Blackwell. pp. 300–313.
Conceptual relativism.Anthony Brueckner - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):295–301.
On Davidson's idea of a conceptual scheme.P. M. S. Hacker - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (184):289-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
15 (#244,896)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hans-Johann Glock
University of Zürich

References found in this work

From a Logical Point of View.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1953 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Individuals.P. F. Strawson - 1959 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 14 (2):246-246.
Against Method.P. Feyerabend - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):331-342.

View all 9 references / Add more references