- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Brain, Behavior, and Knowledge
Neuroethics 4 (3):191-194 (2010)
Abstract
In “Minds, Brains, and Norms,” Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson claim that the idea that ‘you are your brain’ does not contribute to a plausible account of human behavior. I argue that they leave too little of the brain in their account of different types of behaviorAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Teleological behaviorism and the intentional scheme.Hugh Lacey - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):134-135.
Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson, Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience.Stephen J. Morse - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (1):158-163.
Metabolic explanations of eating behavior.Mark I. Friedman - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (4):583-584.
The concept of “command neurons” in explanations of behavior.C. A. Fowler & M. T. Turvey - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (1):20-22.
Adaptive and nonadaptive explanations of sociopathy.Chris Moore & Michael R. Rose - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):566-567.
Some limitations of homeostatic explanations of feeding behavior.Robin B. Kanarek - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (4):584-585.
Restoring Mind-Brain Supervenience: A Proposal.Robert G. Lantin - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 35:136-142.
Food security and obesity: Can passerine foraging behavior inform explanations for human weight gain?Ursula Pool - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
Deterministic Attributions of Behavior: Brain versus Genes.Kevin R. Peters, Alena Kalinina, Nastassja M. Downer & Amy Van Elswyk - 2021 - Neuroethics 14 (3):507-528.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-06-30
Downloads
74 (#218,018)
6 months
3 (#1,207,210)
2010-06-30
Downloads
74 (#218,018)
6 months
3 (#1,207,210)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
More on the Conceptual and the Empirical: Misunderstandings, Clarifications, and Replies. [REVIEW]Michael S. Pardo & Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):215-222.
References found in this work
Neuroscience of rule-guided behavior.Silvia A. Bunge & Jonathan D. Wallis (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo