The justification for teaching the visual arts in schools

Abstract

The justifications that are usually offered - in England - for teaching the arts are either in terms of the development of "creativity" or the possibility of self expression, or, in terms of moral and social education. I examine both types of claim and reject them. In their place I offer justifications in terms of intrinsic value and enculturisation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Opening Doors: Using the creative arts in learning and teaching.Helen Simons & Judy Hicks - 2006 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5 (1):77-90.
The Philosophy of the Visual Arts.Philip A. Alperson (ed.) - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.
The Philosophy of the visual arts.Philip Alperson (ed.) - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Moral Justifications - An Experiment.Robert E. Chiles - 1996 - Teaching Philosophy 19 (2):155-165.
Phenomenology of the Visual Arts.Paul Crowther - 2009 - Stanford University Press.
University Challenge: Dynamic subject knowledge, teaching and transition.Andrew Green - 2006 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5 (3):275-290.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-27

Downloads
6 (#1,475,089)

6 months
1 (#1,498,899)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references