Critique of the Power of Judgment

Philosophical Review 111 (3):429 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This new translation is an extremely welcome addition to the continuing Cambridge Edition of Kant’s works. English-speaking readers of the third Critique have long been hampered by the lack of an adequate translation of this important and difficult work. James Creed Meredith’s much-reprinted translation has charm and elegance, but it is often too loose to be useful for scholarly purposes. Moreover it does not include the first version of Kant’s introduction, the so-called “First Introduction,” which is now recognized as indispensable for an understanding of the work. Werner Pluhar’s more recent translation, which does include the First Introduction, is highly accurate when it confines itself to rendering Kant’s German. However, it is often more of a reconstruction than a translation, containing so many interpretative interpolations that it is often difficult to separate out Kant’s original text from the translator’s contributions. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews have provided a translation that compares to or exceeds Pluhar’s in its literal approach to the German, but that confines all interpretative material to footnotes and endnotes, so that the text itself, with all its unclarities and ambiguities, lies open to view. In addition, Guyer, as editor of the volume, has provided a great deal of valuable supplementary material. This includes an introduction with an outline of the work and details of the history of its composition and publication, and a wealth of endnotes offering clarifications of the text, background information, and, most strikingly, many references to related passages in Kant’s voluminous writings, particularly in connection with Kant’s earlier writings related to aesthetics. The edition also records differences among the first three editions of the work, and—of particular interest—erasures from and additions to Kant’s manuscript of the First Introduction. Although the introduction and endnotes reflect interpretative views that are sometimes disputable, this supplementary material makes the present edition into a valuable resource even for those able to read the text in German.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critique of the Power of Judgment.Paul Guyer & Eric Matthews (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays.Paul Guyer (ed.) - 2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Ingenio, Uso Hipotético de la Razón y Juicio Reflexionante en la Filosofía de Kant.Manuel Sánchez Rodríguez - 2012 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 29 (2):577-592.
Causation in Reflective Judgment.Michael Kurak - 2016 - Kant Studies Online (1):12-41.
Kant's aesthetics and teleology.Hannah Ginsborg - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Critique of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 1892 - Prometheus Books. Edited by J. H. Bernard.
Critique of judgment.Immanuel Kant - 1790 - New York: Barnes & Noble. Edited by J. H. Bernard.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
180 (#105,892)

6 months
20 (#126,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Hannah Ginsborg
University of California, Berkeley
Paul Guyer
Brown University

Citations of this work

Aesthetic practices and normativity.Robbie Kubala - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):408–425.
On Liking Aesthetic Value.Keren Gorodeisky - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (2):261-280.
Agential thinking.Walter Veit - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5):13393-13419.

View all 329 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references