Chomsky defensor de las contrastaciones cruciales

Páginas de Filosofía (Universidad Nacional del Comahue) 11 (14):127-145 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Noam Chomsky supone, de forma equivocada, que en la ciencia hay contrastaciones cruciales. La confirmación de las hipótesis de una teoría x no nos habilita para desestimar la teoría z, incompatible con x. Se sugiere, como alternativa, un “principio de complementariedad en lingüística”, en virtud del cual podría aceptarse que alguna teoría lingüística zes científica si ésta caracteriza ciertos fenómenos lingüísticos aun cuando resulte incompatible con la de Chomsky.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ideas of Chomsky.Tony Tyley, Noam Chomsky, Janet Hoenig, Bryan Magee & Inc B. B. C. Education & Training - 1997 - Films for the Humanities & Sciences Distributed Under License From Bbc Worldwide Americas. Edited by Bryan Magee.
Chomsky e a linguística cartesiana.Candice Glenday - 2010 - Trans/Form/Ação 33 (1):183-202.
Chomsky on Miseducation.Noam Chomsky - 2004 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Noam Chomsky - 1965 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-17

Downloads
5 (#1,540,420)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theory and Evidence.Clark Glymour - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):498-500.
Theory and Evidence.Clark Glymour - 1982 - Erkenntnis 18 (1):105-130.
The New Riddle of Induction.Nelson Goodman - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references