Aristotle and the Moral Square of Opposition

The Monist 54 (1):100-105 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean—hereafter DM—still provokes discussion. To my knowledge this discussion has not yet singled out an important logical pattern latent in DM. I think this pattern can help explain Aristotle’s failure to “… speak in terms of rules of conduct which apply equally to all men, and which all can understand.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Music Criticism?Peter Kivy - 1990 - The Monist 73 (2):247-268.
II Are There Black Holes In Logic?George Myro - 1988 - The Monist 71 (3):365-376.
The Square of Opposition.Everett J. Nelson - 1932 - The Monist 42 (2):269-278.
The Doctrine of the Indefinite Terms in the Ancient Commentators of Aristotle.Manuel A. Correia - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 3:93-99.
Aristotle and Łukasiewicz on Existential Import.Stephen Read - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (3):535--544.
Admissible Versus Valid Rules.Gerhard Schurz - 1994 - The Monist 77 (3):376-388.
On Aristotle's square of opposition.Manley Thompson - 1953 - Philosophical Review 62 (2):251-265.
Is Philosophy Transcendental?William H. Bossart - 1971 - The Monist 55 (2):293-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
46 (#336,730)

6 months
2 (#1,446,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Between Square and Hexagon in Oresme’s Livre du Ciel et du Monde.Lorenz Demey - 2019 - History and Philosophy of Logic 41 (1):36-47.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references