Validity and Effectiveness of Ambiguity: A Famous Argument by Socrates [Book Review]

Argumentation 26 (3):393-407 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


An argument can be superficially valid and rhetorically effective even if what is plausibly meant, what is derived from what, and how it is derived is not at all clear. An example of such an argument is provided by Socrates’s famous refutation of Euthyphro’s second definition of holy, which is generally regarded as clearly valid and successful. This paper provides a stricter logical analysis than the ones in the literature. In particular, it is shown that the argument contains a syntactically ambiguous expression, a passage that needs to be read charitably, and a previously unnoticed but crucial shift between two notions of unholy. Different analyses may be provided, depending on how these interpretation problems are solved. The conditions under which the refutation is valid and successful are far from obvious, and are here explicitly specified



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Chiastic Contradiction at Euthyphro 9e1-11b5. Kim - 2004 - Phronesis 49 (3):219-224.
Socrates on the definition of Piety.S. Marc Cohen - 1971 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1):1-13.
A Partisan's Guide to Socratic Intellectualism.Matthew Evans - 2010 - In Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good. Oxford University Press. pp. 6.
The Euthyphro Argument (9d–11b).Brendan O'Sullivan - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):657-675.
The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument.Kristin Mickelson - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
Prajñākaragupta on the Two Truths and Argumentation.Hisayasu Kobayashi - 2011 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):427-439.
Scepticism and the Interpreter.Damian Cox - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (2):61-72.
Socrates and euthyphro: The argument and its revival.Terence Irwin - 2006 - In Lindsay Judson & Vassilis Karasmanis (eds.), Remembering Socrates: philosophical essays. New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

44 (#361,624)

6 months
5 (#641,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giuseppe Spolaore
University of Padua

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Definition.Richard Robinson - 1950 - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Plato's Introduction of Forms.R. M. Dancy - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Definitions.Anil Gupta - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Socratic studies.Gregory Vlastos - 1994 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Myles Burnyeat.

View all 11 references / Add more references