Participatory technology assessment: some critical questions [Book Review]

Poiesis and Praxis 1 (2):151-159 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10202-002-0015-0

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Legitimation problems of participatory processes in technology assessment and technology policy.Thomas Saretzki - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Technology assessment and ethics.Barbara Skorupinski & Konrad Ott - 2002 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (2):95-122.
Putting precaution to debate – about the precautionary principle and participatory technology assessment.Barbara Skorupinski - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):87-102.
Why do we still need participatory technology assessment?Leonhard Hennen - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):27-41.
Questioning 'Participation': A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment.Michiel van Oudheusden - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):673-690.
A Citizens' Conference on Gene Therapy in Japan: A Feasibility Study of the Consensus Conference Method in Japan. [REVIEW]Yukio Wakamatsu - 1999 - AI and Society 13 (1-2):22-43.
Participatory democracy, science and technology: an exploration in the philosophy of science.Karl Rogers - 2008 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Participating Despite Questions: Toward a More Confident Participatory Technology Assessment: Commentary on: “Questioning ‘Participation’: A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment”. [REVIEW]David H. Guston - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):691-697.
One size fits all? On the institutionalization of participatory technology assessment and its interconnection with national ways of policy-making: the cases of Switzerland and Austria.Erich Griessler - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):61-80.
Old problems, new directions and upcoming requirements in participatory technology assessment.Michael Ornetzeder & Karen Kastenhofer - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):1-5.
From invited to uninvited participation (and back?): rethinking civil society engagement in technology assessment and development.Peter Wehling - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):43-60.
Health technology assessment: trying to bring empirical and ethical inquiry together. [REVIEW]G. J. van der Wilt - 2004 - Poiesis and Praxis 2 (2-3):195-206.
Is modern information technology enabling the evolution of a more direct democracy?Douglas C. Walton - 2007 - World Futures 63 (5 & 6):365 – 385.
Wissenschaftstheoretische anmerkungen zur technikfolgenabschätzung: Die prognose- und quantifizierungsproblematik. [REVIEW]Armin Grunwald - 1994 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 25 (1):51 - 70.
A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology.David Wright - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):199-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
18 (#832,589)

6 months
4 (#790,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references