Old problems, new directions and upcoming requirements in participatory technology assessment

Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):1-5 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discussions on the role of participatory approaches in technology assessment and technology policy have a long history. While in the beginning this subject was handled mainly as a theoretical requirement for democratic governance of technology, active involvement of stakeholders and laypeople became popular in TA exercises throughout the 1980s. Since then, a variety of participatory TA (pTA) methods and strategies have been developed and widely used, raising further far-reaching expectations. It has been argued that participatory approaches might broaden and hence enrich the knowledge and value base in ongoing technological discourses and eventually improve the factual as well as democratic legitimacy of technology-related decisions (Joss and Bellucci 2002). Moreover, a stronger integration of diverse actors and stakeholders was linked to the promise of better socially embedded solutions, an increased acceptance and enhanced diffusion of technology as well as technology policy. However

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Technology assessment and ethics.Barbara Skorupinski & Konrad Ott - 2002 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (2):95-122.
Wissenschaftstheoretische anmerkungen zur technikfolgenabschätzung: Die prognose- und quantifizierungsproblematik. [REVIEW]Armin Grunwald - 1994 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 25 (1):51 - 70.
Probing technoscience.Karen Kastenhofer & Astrid Schwarz - 2011 - Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):61-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-15

Downloads
44 (#343,283)

6 months
11 (#191,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Kastenhofer
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations