Is More Life Always Better? The New Biology of Aging and the Meaning of Life

Hastings Center Report 33 (4):31-39 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The social consequences of extending the human life span might be quite bad; perhaps the worst outcome is that power could be concentrated into ever fewer hands, as those who wield it gave way more slowly to death and disease. But the worry that more life would damage individuals' quality of life is not persuasive. Depending on what the science of aging makes possible, and on how people plan their lives, longer life might even facilitate a richer and deeper life.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
88 (#197,978)

6 months
11 (#272,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What is the ethics of ageing?Christopher Simon Wareham - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (2):128-132.
Life, Meaning of.Thaddeus Metz - 2015 - In Henk ten Have (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer. pp. 1-6.
Genome Editing for Longer Lives: The Problem of Loneliness.C. S. Wareham - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2):309-314.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A cure for aging?Timothy F. Murphy - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (3):237-255.
The urgency of research on ageing.Robin Holliday - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (2):89-90.

Add more references